glm-5.2
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
glm-5.2vsgpt-6-luna
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-luna
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Reasoning
glm-5.2Better fit
Supported
gpt-6-luna
Not supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
glm-5.2 · leads in 15
56%
Moderate
gpt-6-luna · leads in 14
52%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
glm-5.250%gpt-6-lunaLeads72%Logical reasoning
glm-5.2Leads57%gpt-6-luna28%Mathematics
glm-5.2Leads62%gpt-6-luna42%Scientific and technical depth
glm-5.2Leads56%gpt-6-luna46%Planning and task decomposition
glm-5.2Leads57%gpt-6-luna29%
Coding & tools
Code generation
glm-5.247%gpt-6-lunaLeads49%Debugging and code review
glm-5.2Leads58%gpt-6-luna39%Agentic coding
glm-5.2Leads61%gpt-6-luna35%Tool and function calling
glm-5.2Leads55%gpt-6-luna52%SQL and query writing
glm-5.2Leads63%gpt-6-luna48%
Writing & language
Creative writing
glm-5.244%gpt-6-lunaLeads54%Professional writing
glm-5.251%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Conversational quality
glm-5.249%gpt-6-lunaLeads54%Multilingual ability
glm-5.2Leads84%gpt-6-luna61%Translation
glm-5.2Leads61%gpt-6-luna57%Summarization
glm-5.2Leads57%gpt-6-luna37%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
glm-5.2Leads61%gpt-6-luna39%Professional domains
glm-5.2Leads53%gpt-6-luna49%Information extraction
glm-5.2Leads61%gpt-6-luna57%Classification and labeling
glm-5.261%gpt-6-lunaLeads62%Long-context handling
glm-5.2Leads67%gpt-6-luna22%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
glm-5.253%gpt-6-lunaLeads55%Structured output
glm-5.260%gpt-6-lunaLeads70%Factual accuracy
glm-5.250%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Safety and alignment
glm-5.245%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Steerability
glm-5.249%gpt-6-lunaLeads53%Output consistency
glm-5.260%gpt-6-lunaLeads80%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
glm-5.237%gpt-6-lunaLeads59%Cost efficiency
glm-5.243%gpt-6-lunaLeads71%Image understanding
glm-5.2No image inputgpt-6-lunaNo image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
glm-5.2
99.94%
gpt-6-luna
92.86%
Average response time
glm-5.2
2,766.68 ms
gpt-6-luna
47,470.23 ms
P95 API latency
glm-5.2
10,000 ms
gpt-6-luna
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 100%gpt-6-luna: 92.6%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 666 msgpt-6-luna: 48,342 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
glm-5.2: 5,000 msgpt-6-luna: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.2 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- glm-5.2 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.