gemini-3.7-flash
Chat comparison
gemini-3.7-flashvsGLM-5.3-Flash
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
GLM-5.3-Flash
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemini-3.7-flashBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
GLM-5.3-Flash
400,000 tokens
Input formats
gemini-3.7-flash
text, image
GLM-5.3-Flash
text
Vision
gemini-3.7-flashBetter fit
Supported
GLM-5.3-Flash
Not supported
Reasoning
gemini-3.7-flash
Not supported
GLM-5.3-FlashBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.7-flash
82.7%
GLM-5.3-Flash
82.77%
Average response time
gemini-3.7-flash
5,049.96 ms
GLM-5.3-Flash
29,977.45 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.7-flash
30,000 ms
GLM-5.3-Flash
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gemini-3.7-flash has a larger context window.
- gemini-3.7-flash supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gemini-3.7-flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.