LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.6-flash-highvsgemma4:31b

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.6-flash-high

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

gemini-3.6-flash-high

text, json

gemma4:31b

text

Reasoning

gemini-3.6-flash-highBetter fit

Supported

gemma4:31b

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.6-flash-high

99.86%

gemma4:31b

99.7%

Average response time

gemini-3.6-flash-high

8,324.47 ms

gemma4:31b

5,467.27 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.6-flash-high

30,000 ms

gemma4:31b

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.6-flash-high: 100%gemma4:31b: 100%
12 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.6-flash-high: 8,350 msgemma4:31b: 6,970 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.6-flash-high: 30,000 msgemma4:31b: 30,000 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.

Keep exploring