LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Google logo

gemini-3.1-flash-litevskimi-k3

Moonshot AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

256,000 tokens

kimi-k3Better fit

1,000,000 tokens

JSON mode

gemini-3.1-flash-liteBetter fit

Supported

kimi-k3

Not supported

Reasoning

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Not supported

kimi-k3Better fit

Supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

99.89%

kimi-k3

98.65%

Average response time

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

2,790.19 ms

kimi-k3

5,233.65 ms

P95 API latency

gemini-3.1-flash-lite

10,000 ms

kimi-k3

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-flash-lite: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
8 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-flash-lite: 3,229 mskimi-k3: 7,514 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

gemini-3.1-flash-lite: 10,000 mskimi-k3: 10,000 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • kimi-k3 has a larger context window.
  • gemini-3.1-flash-lite recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • gemini-3.1-flash-lite recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring