gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-flash-litevskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
256,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6Better fit
262,000 tokens
Input formats
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
text, image
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Vision
gemini-3.1-flash-liteBetter fit
Supported
kimi-k2.6
Not supported
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Not supported
kimi-k2.6Better fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
99.91%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
2,801.04 ms
kimi-k2.6
4,259.5 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
10,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k2.6 has a larger context window.
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite supports image input while the other model does not.
Keep exploring
About gemini-3.1-flash-liteAbout kimi-k2.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs gemini-3.1-flash-liteanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs kimi-k2.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs gemini-3.1-flash-liteanthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs kimi-k2.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs gemini-3.1-flash-liteanthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs kimi-k2.6