gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Chat comparison
gemini-3.1-flash-litevsgemini-3.6-flash-high
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-3.6-flash-high
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
text, image
gemini-3.6-flash-high
text, json
Vision
gemini-3.1-flash-liteBetter fit
Supported
gemini-3.6-flash-high
Not supported
Reasoning
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Not supported
gemini-3.6-flash-highBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
99.82%
gemini-3.6-flash-high
99.86%
Average response time
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
4,081.47 ms
gemini-3.6-flash-high
8,324.47 ms
P95 API latency
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
10,000 ms
gemini-3.6-flash-high
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.