DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsmistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
400,000 tokens
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
32,000 tokens
Tool calling
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Reasoning
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
71.98%
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
99.75%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,172.97 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
5,593.17 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a larger context window.
- mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- mistral-Small-24B-Instruct-2501 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.