DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsL3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
400,000 tokens
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
8,000 tokens
Tool calling
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
JSON mode
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
Reasoning
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.02%
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
100%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,590.36 ms
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
1,216.14 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo
5,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a larger context window.