DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsgrok-4.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
grok-4.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
400,000 tokens
grok-4.6Better fit
500,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.05%
grok-4.6
76.76%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,536.19 ms
grok-4.6
17,109.06 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
grok-4.6
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%grok-4.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 msgrok-4.6: 40,854 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 msgrok-4.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- grok-4.6 has a larger context window.
- grok-4.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
Keep exploring
About DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731About grok-4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs grok-4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs grok-4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs grok-4.6