DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsgpt-6-astra
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6-astra
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
400,000 tokens
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
Input formats
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
text
gpt-6-astra
text, image
Vision
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Not supported
gpt-6-astraBetter fit
Supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.12%
gpt-6-astra
95.39%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,600.6 ms
gpt-6-astra
13,252.21 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
gpt-6-astra
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-6-astra has a larger context window.
- gpt-6-astra supports image input while the other model does not.
- gpt-6-astra recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.