DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsglm-5.3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
glm-5.3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
400,000 tokens
glm-5.3Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.05%
glm-5.3
91.84%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,536.19 ms
glm-5.3
12,437.7 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
glm-5.3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%glm-5.3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 msglm-5.3: 27,974 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 msglm-5.3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- glm-5.3 has a larger context window.
- glm-5.3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
Keep exploring
About DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731About glm-5.3anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs glm-5.3anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs glm-5.3anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs glm-5.3