DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGLM-5.3-Flash
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
GLM-5.3-Flash
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
JSON mode
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Better fit
Supported
GLM-5.3-Flash
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
62.05%
GLM-5.3-Flash
82.77%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
46,536.19 ms
GLM-5.3-Flash
29,977.45 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
60,000 ms
GLM-5.3-Flash
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 67.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 86%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 41,575 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 23,005 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: 60,000 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- GLM-5.3-Flash recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
Keep exploring
About DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731About GLM-5.3-Flashanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs GLM-5.3-Flashanthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs GLM-5.3-Flashanthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs GLM-5.3-Flash