LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

DeepSeek logo

deepseek-v4-flash:0731vsGLM-5.3-Flash

Z.ai logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

Checking current pricing…

GLM-5.3-Flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Context window

deepseek-v4-flash:0731Better fit

1,024,000 tokens

GLM-5.3-Flash

400,000 tokens

JSON mode

deepseek-v4-flash:0731Better fit

Supported

GLM-5.3-Flash

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

99.75%

GLM-5.3-Flash

82.77%

Average response time

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

10,827.47 ms

GLM-5.3-Flash

29,977.45 ms

P95 API latency

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

60,000 ms

GLM-5.3-Flash

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 99.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 86%
12 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 10,088 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 23,005 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 60,000 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 60,000 ms
12 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • deepseek-v4-flash:0731 has a larger context window.
  • deepseek-v4-flash:0731 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring