deepseek-v4-flash
Input $0.05 USD · Output $0.10 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flashvsminimax-m2.7
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m2.7
Input $0.03 USD · Output $0.05 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-flashBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
minimax-m2.7
180,000 tokens
Streaming
deepseek-v4-flashBetter fit
Supported
minimax-m2.7
Not supported
JSON mode
deepseek-v4-flash
Not supported
minimax-m2.7Better fit
Supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
deepseek-v4-flash
124
minimax-m2.7
615
Observed success rate
deepseek-v4-flash
96.77%
minimax-m2.7
99.35%
Average API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
19,888.04 ms
minimax-m2.7
6,572.2 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
60,000 ms
minimax-m2.7
30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0005
Output estimate
$0.00025
Estimated total
$0.00075
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0003
Output estimate
$0.000125
Estimated total
$0.000425
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-flash has a larger context window.
- minimax-m2.7 recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- minimax-m2.7 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.