deepseek-v4-flash
Input $0.05 USD · Output $0.10 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flashvsgpt-5.4-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.4-mini
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.24 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-flashBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
gpt-5.4-mini
400,000 tokens
Input formats
deepseek-v4-flash
text
gpt-5.4-mini
text, image
Vision
deepseek-v4-flash
Not supported
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
JSON mode
deepseek-v4-flash
Not supported
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
deepseek-v4-flash
124
gpt-5.4-mini
57
Observed success rate
deepseek-v4-flash
96.77%
gpt-5.4-mini
43.86%
Average API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
19,888.04 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
14,631.46 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
60,000 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0005
Output estimate
$0.00025
Estimated total
$0.00075
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.0006
Estimated total
$0.001
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-flash has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.4-mini supports image input while the other model does not.
- deepseek-v4-flash recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.