deepseek-v4-flash
Input $0.05 USD · Output $0.10 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flashvsgpt-5.3-codex-spark
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
Input $0.36 USD · Output $2.81 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
deepseek-v4-flashBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
400,000 tokens
JSON mode
deepseek-v4-flash
Not supported
gpt-5.3-codex-sparkBetter fit
Supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
deepseek-v4-flash
124
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
52
Observed success rate
deepseek-v4-flash
96.77%
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
100%
Average API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
19,888.04 ms
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
1,363.69 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
60,000 ms
gpt-5.3-codex-spark
5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0005
Output estimate
$0.00025
Estimated total
$0.00075
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0036
Output estimate
$0.007025
Estimated total
$0.010625
Quick take
- deepseek-v4-flash has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.3-codex-spark recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- gpt-5.3-codex-spark recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.