deepseek-v4-flash
Input $0.05 USD · Output $0.10 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
deepseek-v4-flashvsgemini-3.1-flash-lite
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Input $0.03 USD · Output $0.08 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
deepseek-v4-flash
text
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
text, image
Vision
deepseek-v4-flash
Not supported
gemini-3.1-flash-liteBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
deepseek-v4-flashBetter fit
Supported
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Not supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
deepseek-v4-flash
124
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
256
Observed success rate
deepseek-v4-flash
96.77%
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
100%
Average API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
19,888.04 ms
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
1,967.98 ms
P95 API latency
deepseek-v4-flash
60,000 ms
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
5,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0005
Output estimate
$0.00025
Estimated total
$0.00075
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0003
Output estimate
$0.0002
Estimated total
$0.0005
Quick take
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite supports image input while the other model does not.
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- gemini-3.1-flash-lite recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.