DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashvsgrok-4.5
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
grok-4.5
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashBetter fit
1,000,000 tokens
grok-4.5
500,000 tokens
Reasoning
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashBetter fit
Supported
grok-4.5
Not supported
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
96.78%
grok-4.5
94.97%
Average response time
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
4,484.83 ms
grok-4.5
4,894.43 ms
P95 API latency
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
30,000 ms
grok-4.5
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 98.4%grok-4.5: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 8,962 msgrok-4.5: 19,135 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 30,000 msgrok-4.5: 30,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a larger context window.
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.