codestral-latest
Input $0.01 USD · Output $0.01 USD / 1M tokens
chat comparison
codestral-latestvsgpt-5.4-mini
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and observed LLM7 usage.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.4-mini
Input $0.04 USD · Output $0.24 USD / 1M tokens
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
codestral-latest
32,000 tokens
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
400,000 tokens
Input formats
codestral-latest
text
gpt-5.4-mini
text, image
Vision
codestral-latest
Not supported
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
Reasoning
codestral-latest
Not supported
gpt-5.4-miniBetter fit
Supported
Observed usage comparison
A 30-day LLM7 snapshot, not a global model benchmark.
Requests handled
codestral-latest
1,748
gpt-5.4-mini
57
Observed success rate
codestral-latest
99.6%
gpt-5.4-mini
43.86%
Average API latency
codestral-latest
2,124.08 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
14,631.46 ms
P95 API latency
codestral-latest
10,000 ms
gpt-5.4-mini
60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Try the same request volume against both public price lists.
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0001
Output estimate
$0.000025
Estimated total
$0.000125
Cost calculator
Adjust the volume to see an instant estimate at the current public price.
01M
Input estimate
$0.0004
Output estimate
$0.0006
Estimated total
$0.001
Quick take
- gpt-5.4-mini has a larger context window.
- gpt-5.4-mini supports image input while the other model does not.
- codestral-latest recorded a higher observed LLM7 request success rate during this period.
- codestral-latest recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.