claude-sonnet-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-sonnet-5vskimi-k2.6
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k2.6
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-sonnet-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
kimi-k2.6
262,000 tokens
Input formats
claude-sonnet-5
text
kimi-k2.6
text, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-sonnet-5 · leads in 27
82%
Strong
kimi-k2.6 · leads in 2
54%
Moderate
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-sonnet-5Leads81%kimi-k2.647%Logical reasoning
claude-sonnet-5Leads83%kimi-k2.660%Mathematics
claude-sonnet-5Leads82%kimi-k2.667%Scientific and technical depth
claude-sonnet-5Leads82%kimi-k2.653%Planning and task decomposition
claude-sonnet-5Leads84%kimi-k2.659%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-sonnet-5Leads79%kimi-k2.650%Debugging and code review
claude-sonnet-5Leads86%kimi-k2.658%Agentic coding
claude-sonnet-5Leads88%kimi-k2.660%Tool and function calling
claude-sonnet-5Leads85%kimi-k2.656%SQL and query writing
claude-sonnet-5Leads85%kimi-k2.659%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-sonnet-5Leads84%kimi-k2.644%Professional writing
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%kimi-k2.649%Conversational quality
claude-sonnet-5Leads88%kimi-k2.651%Multilingual ability
claude-sonnet-5Leads72%kimi-k2.665%Translation
claude-sonnet-5Leads85%kimi-k2.657%Summarization
claude-sonnet-5Leads87%kimi-k2.654%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-sonnet-5Leads83%kimi-k2.662%Professional domains
claude-sonnet-5Leads86%kimi-k2.650%Information extraction
claude-sonnet-5Leads87%kimi-k2.664%Classification and labeling
claude-sonnet-5Leads85%kimi-k2.655%Long-context handling
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%kimi-k2.654%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-sonnet-5Leads87%kimi-k2.655%Structured output
claude-sonnet-5Leads93%kimi-k2.667%Factual accuracy
claude-sonnet-5Leads91%kimi-k2.651%Safety and alignment
claude-sonnet-5Leads88%kimi-k2.643%Steerability
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%kimi-k2.648%Output consistency
claude-sonnet-5Leads96%kimi-k2.656%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-sonnet-531%kimi-k2.6Leads37%Cost efficiency
claude-sonnet-540%kimi-k2.6Leads47%Image understanding
claude-sonnet-5No image inputkimi-k2.6No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-sonnet-5
96.99%
kimi-k2.6
100%
Average response time
claude-sonnet-5
18,802.22 ms
kimi-k2.6
12,518.72 ms
P95 API latency
claude-sonnet-5
60,000 ms
kimi-k2.6
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 100%kimi-k2.6: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 12,393 mskimi-k2.6: 16,670 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-sonnet-5: 60,000 mskimi-k2.6: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-sonnet-5 has a larger context window.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- kimi-k2.6 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.