claude-sonnet-5
Chat comparison
claude-sonnet-5vsgpt-5.6-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-5.6-sol
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-sonnet-5
text
gpt-5.6-sol
text, image
Vision
claude-sonnet-5
Not supported
gpt-5.6-solBetter fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
claude-sonnet-5 · leads in 11
82%
Strong
gpt-5.6-sol · leads in 17
84%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-sonnet-581%gpt-5.6-solLeads93%Logical reasoning
claude-sonnet-583%gpt-5.6-solLeads88%Mathematics
claude-sonnet-582%gpt-5.6-solLeads94%Scientific and technical depth
claude-sonnet-582%gpt-5.6-solLeads88%Planning and task decomposition
claude-sonnet-584%gpt-5.6-solLeads87%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-sonnet-579%gpt-5.6-solLeads83%Debugging and code review
claude-sonnet-586%gpt-5.6-solLeads90%Agentic coding
claude-sonnet-588%gpt-5.6-solLeads91%Tool and function calling
claude-sonnet-585%gpt-5.6-solLeads88%SQL and query writing
claude-sonnet-585%gpt-5.6-solLeads91%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-sonnet-5Leads84%gpt-5.6-sol79%Professional writing
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%gpt-5.6-sol85%Conversational quality
claude-sonnet-5Leads88%gpt-5.6-sol86%Multilingual ability
claude-sonnet-572%gpt-5.6-solLeads81%Translation
claude-sonnet-585%gpt-5.6-solLeads89%Summarization
claude-sonnet-5Leads87%gpt-5.6-sol85%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-sonnet-583%gpt-5.6-solLeads91%Professional domains
claude-sonnet-586%gpt-5.6-sol86%Information extraction
claude-sonnet-587%gpt-5.6-solLeads92%Classification and labeling
claude-sonnet-585%gpt-5.6-solLeads97%Long-context handling
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%gpt-5.6-sol85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-sonnet-5Leads87%gpt-5.6-sol84%Structured output
claude-sonnet-5Leads93%gpt-5.6-sol90%Factual accuracy
claude-sonnet-5Leads91%gpt-5.6-sol83%Safety and alignment
claude-sonnet-5Leads88%gpt-5.6-sol74%Steerability
claude-sonnet-5Leads90%gpt-5.6-sol81%Output consistency
claude-sonnet-5Leads96%gpt-5.6-sol91%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-sonnet-531%gpt-5.6-solLeads45%Cost efficiency
claude-sonnet-540%gpt-5.6-solLeads67%Image understanding
claude-sonnet-5No image inputgpt-5.6-sol59%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-sonnet-5
96.99%
gpt-5.6-sol
94.45%
Average response time
claude-sonnet-5
18,802.22 ms
gpt-5.6-sol
36,902.82 ms
P95 API latency
claude-sonnet-5
60,000 ms
gpt-5.6-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Quick take
- gpt-5.6-sol supports image input while the other model does not.
- claude-sonnet-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.