claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-opus-5vsgpt-6.1-sol
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
gpt-6.1-sol
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-opus-5
text, image
gpt-6.1-sol
text, image, json
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-opus-5 · leads in 12
83%
Strong
gpt-6.1-sol · leads in 17
86%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-opus-586%gpt-6.1-solLeads96%Logical reasoning
claude-opus-588%gpt-6.1-solLeads89%Mathematics
claude-opus-587%gpt-6.1-solLeads95%Scientific and technical depth
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6.1-sol90%Planning and task decomposition
claude-opus-5Leads89%gpt-6.1-sol88%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-opus-579%gpt-6.1-solLeads86%Debugging and code review
claude-opus-588%gpt-6.1-solLeads92%Agentic coding
claude-opus-590%gpt-6.1-solLeads93%Tool and function calling
claude-opus-588%gpt-6.1-solLeads90%SQL and query writing
claude-opus-586%gpt-6.1-solLeads94%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-opus-5Leads88%gpt-6.1-sol82%Professional writing
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6.1-sol87%Conversational quality
claude-opus-5Leads90%gpt-6.1-sol88%Multilingual ability
claude-opus-576%gpt-6.1-solLeads86%Translation
claude-opus-589%gpt-6.1-solLeads92%Summarization
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6.1-sol87%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-opus-590%gpt-6.1-solLeads95%Professional domains
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6.1-sol89%Information extraction
claude-opus-588%gpt-6.1-solLeads96%Classification and labeling
claude-opus-582%gpt-6.1-solLeads100%Long-context handling
claude-opus-5Leads93%gpt-6.1-sol89%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-opus-588%gpt-6.1-sol88%Structured output
claude-opus-590%gpt-6.1-solLeads99%Factual accuracy
claude-opus-5Leads93%gpt-6.1-sol86%Safety and alignment
claude-opus-5Leads91%gpt-6.1-sol79%Steerability
claude-opus-5Leads92%gpt-6.1-sol84%Output consistency
claude-opus-592%gpt-6.1-solLeads97%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-opus-512%gpt-6.1-solLeads40%Cost efficiency
claude-opus-521%gpt-6.1-solLeads49%Image understanding
claude-opus-5Leads81%gpt-6.1-sol68%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-opus-5
99.22%
gpt-6.1-sol
98.17%
Average response time
claude-opus-5
9,181.89 ms
gpt-6.1-sol
18,340.6 ms
P95 API latency
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
gpt-6.1-sol
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 100%gpt-6.1-sol: 91.7%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 5,515 msgpt-6.1-sol: 24,176 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-opus-5: 10,000 msgpt-6.1-sol: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-opus-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.