LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-opus-4-8vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

claude-opus-4-8

text, image

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

text

Vision

claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Not supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-opus-4-8 · leads in 26

85%

Strong

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · leads in 2

66%

Moderate

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-opus-4-8Leads86%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash57%

  • Logical reasoning

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash70%

  • Mathematics

    claude-opus-4-888%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash88%

  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash73%

  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash68%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads80%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash77%

  • Debugging and code review

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash80%

  • Agentic coding

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash80%

  • Tool and function calling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash66%

  • SQL and query writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash80%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads88%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash49%

  • Professional writing

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash57%

  • Conversational quality

    claude-opus-4-8Leads90%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash54%

  • Multilingual ability

    claude-opus-4-8Leads77%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash69%

  • Translation

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash63%

  • Summarization

    claude-opus-4-8Leads93%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash65%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash74%

  • Professional domains

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash60%

  • Information extraction

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash68%

  • Classification and labeling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads85%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash70%

  • Long-context handling

    claude-opus-4-8Leads94%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash80%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-opus-4-8Leads89%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash61%

  • Structured output

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash68%

  • Factual accuracy

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash56%

  • Safety and alignment

    claude-opus-4-8Leads91%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash44%

  • Steerability

    claude-opus-4-8Leads92%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash57%

  • Output consistency

    claude-opus-4-8Leads95%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash61%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-opus-4-813%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLeads80%

  • Cost efficiency

    claude-opus-4-826%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLeads48%

  • Image understanding

    claude-opus-4-878%
    DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNo image input

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-opus-4-8

96.77%

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

97.64%

Average response time

claude-opus-4-8

13,573.98 ms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

4,900.53 ms

P95 API latency

claude-opus-4-8

60,000 ms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 100%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 2,396 msDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 2,735 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 10,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring

About claude-opus-4-8About DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashanthropic/claude-opus-4-6 vs claude-opus-4-8claude-opus-4-8 vs grok-4.7claude-opus-4-8 vs gpt-5.6-lunaDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs gemini-4-argonDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs kimi-k2.6DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs minimax-m2.7