claude-haiku-4-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-haiku-4-5vskimi-k3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
kimi-k3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-haiku-4-5
200,000 tokens
kimi-k3Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-haiku-4-5 · leads in 20
48%
Weak
kimi-k3 · leads in 9
40%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-haiku-4-5Leads44%kimi-k340%Logical reasoning
claude-haiku-4-5Leads23%kimi-k322%Mathematics
claude-haiku-4-529%kimi-k3Leads39%Scientific and technical depth
claude-haiku-4-526%kimi-k3Leads32%Planning and task decomposition
claude-haiku-4-5Leads25%kimi-k323%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-haiku-4-5Leads37%kimi-k331%Debugging and code review
claude-haiku-4-5Leads31%kimi-k329%Agentic coding
claude-haiku-4-532%kimi-k3Leads33%Tool and function calling
claude-haiku-4-5Leads49%kimi-k335%SQL and query writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads36%kimi-k335%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads45%kimi-k334%Professional writing
claude-haiku-4-5Leads56%kimi-k337%Conversational quality
claude-haiku-4-5Leads53%kimi-k334%Multilingual ability
claude-haiku-4-544%kimi-k3Leads61%Translation
claude-haiku-4-545%kimi-k3Leads46%Summarization
claude-haiku-4-543%kimi-k3Leads62%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-haiku-4-533%kimi-k3Leads43%Professional domains
claude-haiku-4-5Leads39%kimi-k334%Information extraction
claude-haiku-4-550%kimi-k3Leads51%Classification and labeling
claude-haiku-4-5Leads50%kimi-k341%Long-context handling
claude-haiku-4-541%kimi-k3Leads85%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-haiku-4-5Leads55%kimi-k334%Structured output
claude-haiku-4-5Leads70%kimi-k350%Factual accuracy
claude-haiku-4-5Leads63%kimi-k340%Safety and alignment
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%kimi-k334%Steerability
claude-haiku-4-5Leads59%kimi-k329%Output consistency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads86%kimi-k348%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-haiku-4-5Leads84%kimi-k335%Cost efficiency
claude-haiku-4-5Leads68%kimi-k339%Image understanding
claude-haiku-4-5No image inputkimi-k3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-haiku-4-5
96.36%
kimi-k3
97.87%
Average response time
claude-haiku-4-5
5,956.97 ms
kimi-k3
12,694.11 ms
P95 API latency
claude-haiku-4-5
30,000 ms
kimi-k3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 3,702 mskimi-k3: 69,350 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-haiku-4-5: 30,000 mskimi-k3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- kimi-k3 has a larger context window.
- kimi-k3 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
- claude-haiku-4-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.