claude-fable-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5vsminimax-m3
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
minimax-m3
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Context window
claude-fable-5Better fit
1,000,000 tokens
minimax-m3
512,000 tokens
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5 · leads in 27
91%
Strong
minimax-m3 · leads in 2
47%
Weak
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m335%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m350%Mathematics
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m351%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m342%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m352%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5Leads88%minimax-m337%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5Leads97%minimax-m347%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m355%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m351%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m348%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m338%Professional writing
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m340%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m343%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-5Leads82%minimax-m365%Translation
claude-fable-5Leads97%minimax-m350%Summarization
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m348%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5Leads96%minimax-m350%Professional domains
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m343%Information extraction
claude-fable-5Leads97%minimax-m351%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5Leads97%minimax-m351%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m359%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m346%Structured output
claude-fable-5Leads98%minimax-m351%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m337%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m335%Steerability
claude-fable-5Leads99%minimax-m344%Output consistency
claude-fable-5Leads84%minimax-m350%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-511%minimax-m3Leads40%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-515%minimax-m3Leads52%Image understanding
claude-fable-5No image inputminimax-m3No image input
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5
99.32%
minimax-m3
99.29%
Average response time
claude-fable-5
8,411.23 ms
minimax-m3
22,425.83 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5
30,000 ms
minimax-m3
60,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 100%minimax-m3: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 10,131 msminimax-m3: 27,175 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 30,000 msminimax-m3: 60,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-fable-5 has a larger context window.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- claude-fable-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.