LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

Anthropic logo

claude-fable-5vsclaude-sonnet-4-6

Anthropic logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

claude-fable-5

Checking current pricing…

claude-sonnet-4-6

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

claude-fable-5

text

claude-sonnet-4-6

text, image

Vision

claude-fable-5

Not supported

claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

Capability scores

AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.

Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+

claude-fable-5 · leads in 26

91%

Strong

claude-sonnet-4-6 · leads in 3

84%

Strong

Knowledge & reasoning

  • General knowledge

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-682%
  • Logical reasoning

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-684%
  • Mathematics

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-682%
  • Scientific and technical depth

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-681%
  • Planning and task decomposition

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-684%

Coding & tools

  • Code generation

    claude-fable-5Leads88%
    claude-sonnet-4-679%
  • Debugging and code review

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-sonnet-4-686%
  • Agentic coding

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-689%
  • Tool and function calling

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-686%
  • SQL and query writing

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-686%

Writing & language

  • Creative writing

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-684%
  • Professional writing

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-689%
  • Conversational quality

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-688%
  • Multilingual ability

    claude-fable-5Leads82%
    claude-sonnet-4-673%
  • Translation

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-sonnet-4-686%
  • Summarization

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-689%

Data & professional work

  • Data analysis

    claude-fable-5Leads96%
    claude-sonnet-4-687%
  • Professional domains

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-685%
  • Information extraction

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-sonnet-4-690%
  • Classification and labeling

    claude-fable-5Leads97%
    claude-sonnet-4-691%
  • Long-context handling

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-691%

Reliability & control

  • Instruction following

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-688%
  • Structured output

    claude-fable-5Leads98%
    claude-sonnet-4-693%
  • Factual accuracy

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-692%
  • Safety and alignment

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-687%
  • Steerability

    claude-fable-5Leads99%
    claude-sonnet-4-689%
  • Output consistency

    claude-fable-584%
    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads97%

Speed, cost & vision

  • Response speed

    claude-fable-511%
    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads40%
  • Cost efficiency

    claude-fable-515%
    claude-sonnet-4-6Leads68%
  • Image understanding

    claude-fable-5No image input
    claude-sonnet-4-662%

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

claude-fable-5

99.32%

claude-sonnet-4-6

97.48%

Average response time

claude-fable-5

8,411.23 ms

claude-sonnet-4-6

17,871.29 ms

P95 API latency

claude-fable-5

30,000 ms

claude-sonnet-4-6

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 100%claude-sonnet-4-6: 100%
21 Sept21 Oct

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 10,131 msclaude-sonnet-4-6: 4,447 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

claude-fable-5: 30,000 msclaude-sonnet-4-6: 5,000 ms
21 Sept21 Oct

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • claude-sonnet-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • claude-fable-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • claude-fable-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring