claude-fable-5
Checking current pricing…
Chat comparison
claude-fable-5vsclaude-opus-5
Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.
Current pricing
See the cost difference clearly
claude-opus-5
Checking current pricing…
What's different
Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.
Input formats
claude-fable-5
text
claude-opus-5
text, image
Vision
claude-fable-5
Not supported
claude-opus-5Better fit
Supported
Capability scores
AI-estimated ratings on 30 criteria from head-to-head comparisons against 86 other text models in the LLM7 catalog, judged by TypeSafe Jev from public information (2026-10-20). Each score is the win rate against the field, relative to the strongest model for that criterion (100%). Not a benchmark.
Below 50%50–79%80–94%95%+
claude-fable-5 · leads in 26
91%
Strong
claude-opus-5 · leads in 3
83%
Strong
Knowledge & reasoning
General knowledge
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-586%Logical reasoning
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-588%Mathematics
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-587%Scientific and technical depth
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-591%Planning and task decomposition
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-589%
Coding & tools
Code generation
claude-fable-5Leads88%claude-opus-579%Debugging and code review
claude-fable-5Leads97%claude-opus-588%Agentic coding
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-590%Tool and function calling
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-588%SQL and query writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-586%
Writing & language
Creative writing
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-588%Professional writing
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-591%Conversational quality
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-590%Multilingual ability
claude-fable-5Leads82%claude-opus-576%Translation
claude-fable-5Leads97%claude-opus-589%Summarization
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-592%
Data & professional work
Data analysis
claude-fable-5Leads96%claude-opus-590%Professional domains
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-592%Information extraction
claude-fable-5Leads97%claude-opus-588%Classification and labeling
claude-fable-5Leads97%claude-opus-582%Long-context handling
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-593%
Reliability & control
Instruction following
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-588%Structured output
claude-fable-5Leads98%claude-opus-590%Factual accuracy
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-593%Safety and alignment
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-591%Steerability
claude-fable-5Leads99%claude-opus-592%Output consistency
claude-fable-584%claude-opus-5Leads92%
Speed, cost & vision
Response speed
claude-fable-511%claude-opus-5Leads12%Cost efficiency
claude-fable-515%claude-opus-5Leads21%Image understanding
claude-fable-5No image inputclaude-opus-581%
Latest LLM7 statistics
Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.
Recent stability
claude-fable-5
98.83%
claude-opus-5
99.69%
Average response time
claude-fable-5
10,866.7 ms
claude-opus-5
9,671.38 ms
P95 API latency
claude-fable-5
60,000 ms
claude-opus-5
30,000 ms
Side-by-side trends
Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.
Request success rate
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 100%claude-opus-5: 100%
Average API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 10,131 msclaude-opus-5: 5,515 ms
P95 API latency
Both models on the same scale
claude-fable-5: 30,000 msclaude-opus-5: 10,000 ms
Estimate your workload
Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.
Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…
Quick take
- claude-opus-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
- The recent stability rates are too close to distinguish meaningfully.
- claude-opus-5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.