LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5vsgrok-4.5

xAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

text, image, json

grok-4.5

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5Better fit

Supported

grok-4.5

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

99.9%

grok-4.5

94.97%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

9,660.43 ms

grok-4.5

4,894.43 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

60,000 ms

grok-4.5

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 100%grok-4.5: 100%
12 Sept28 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 1,018 msgrok-4.5: 19,135 ms
12 Sept28 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: 2,000 msgrok-4.5: 30,000 ms
12 Sept28 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • grok-4.5 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring