LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6vsminimax-m2.7

MiniMax logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

text, image, json

minimax-m2.7

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Streaming

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6Better fit

Supported

minimax-m2.7

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

99.04%

minimax-m2.7

91.38%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

34,570.19 ms

minimax-m2.7

23,175.04 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

60,000 ms

minimax-m2.7

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6: 100%minimax-m2.7: 67.7%
8 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6: 37,206 msminimax-m2.7: 43,855 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6: 60,000 msminimax-m2.7: 60,000 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6 supports image input while the other model does not.
  • anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring