LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8vsGLM-5.3-Flash

Z.ai logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

Checking current pricing…

GLM-5.3-Flash

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

text, image, json

GLM-5.3-Flash

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

GLM-5.3-Flash

Not supported

JSON mode

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Better fit

Supported

GLM-5.3-Flash

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

100%

GLM-5.3-Flash

82.77%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

3,123.57 ms

GLM-5.3-Flash

29,977.45 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

10,000 ms

GLM-5.3-Flash

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 100%GLM-5.3-Flash: 86%
16 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 3,231 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 23,005 ms
16 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8: 10,000 msGLM-5.3-Flash: 60,000 ms
16 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 supports image input while the other model does not.

Keep exploring