LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7vsdeepseek-v4-flash:0731

DeepSeek logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

Checking current pricing…

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

text, image, json

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

text

Vision

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7Better fit

Supported

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

100%

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

99.8%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

4,488.43 ms

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

10,880.97 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

30,000 ms

deepseek-v4-flash:0731

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 100%deepseek-v4-flash:0731: 99.1%
15 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 4,947 msdeepseek-v4-flash:0731: 10,088 ms
15 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7: 30,000 msdeepseek-v4-flash:0731: 60,000 ms
15 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 supports image input while the other model does not.

Keep exploring