LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5vskimi-k3

Moonshot AI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

text, image, json

kimi-k3

text, image

JSON mode

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5Better fit

Supported

kimi-k3

Not supported

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

100%

kimi-k3

98.65%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

10,160.26 ms

kimi-k3

5,233.65 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

60,000 ms

kimi-k3

30,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 100%kimi-k3: 100%
8 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 10,894 mskimi-k3: 7,514 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 60,000 mskimi-k3: 10,000 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.
  • kimi-k3 recorded a lower observed p95 API latency on LLM7 during this period.

Keep exploring