LLM7.io
LLM7.io
Toggle theme

Chat comparison

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5vsgpt-5.6-terra

OpenAI logo

Compare the things that matter before you build: current price, capabilities, and latest aggregated LLM7 statistics.

Current pricing

See the cost difference clearly

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Checking current pricing…

gpt-5.6-terra

Checking current pricing…

What's different

Only capabilities that differ between these models are listed. Green highlights the broader supported option or larger context window.

Input formats

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

text, image, json

gpt-5.6-terra

text, image

Latest LLM7 statistics

Recent aggregated percentages and response-time metrics from LLM7, not a global model benchmark or traffic disclosure.

Recent stability

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

100%

gpt-5.6-terra

92.28%

Average response time

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

10,160.26 ms

gpt-5.6-terra

29,355.89 ms

P95 API latency

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

60,000 ms

gpt-5.6-terra

60,000 ms

Side-by-side trends

Shared charts make the observed differences easier to read. Metrics without enough history stay hidden.

Request success rate

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 100%gpt-5.6-terra: 100%
8 Sept30 Sept

Average API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 10,894 msgpt-5.6-terra: 4,977 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

P95 API latency

Both models on the same scale

anthropic/claude-opus-4-5: 60,000 msgpt-5.6-terra: 10,000 ms
8 Sept30 Sept

Estimate your workload

Published rates are loaded from the pricing API; per-request quotes are billed from actual provider usage.

Checking current pricing…
Checking current pricing…

Quick take

  • anthropic/claude-opus-4-5 recorded higher recent LLM7 stability during this period.

Keep exploring